GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Martić vs Parker

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MartićWinner
75.5

Martić wins: Longevity

Parker
75.3

Parker wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/petra-martic-vs-ernie-parker

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇭🇷 Petra Martić
75.5

Martić leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. French Open quarter-finalist in 2019 and a former world number 14.

1. Petra Martić
75.5
2. Ernie Parker
75.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇭🇷 Petra Martić5 seasons played · career day 3,286400 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Ernie Parker5 seasons played · career day 2,19119 titles
-95.2% vs Martić at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇭🇷 Martić0000100400
🇦🇺 Parker00081630

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMartićActiveParkerRetired
WTA singles titles1
Grand Slam quarter-finals1
Career high ranking14
WTA finals reached4
Seasons on tour18
Grand Slam singles titles1
State championship titles6
Grand Slam finals1
Career years9
Australasian Championships played4
Dominance w25%6670
Peak w20%8290
Longevity w20%8464
Honours w20%6672
Statistics w15%8484

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Martić75.5
Parker75.3
The people
Martić
Parker

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Martić vs Parker. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →