Who is better, Martić or Hamilton?
Petra Martić leads with a GOAT score of 75.5 against 75.4 for Willoughby Hamilton — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Petra Martić above Willoughby Hamilton: 75.5 vs 75.4. Petra Martić leads on Longevity, Statistics. Willoughby Hamilton leads on Peak, Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Martić wins: Longevity, Statistics
Hamilton wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/petra-martic-vs-willoughby-hamilton
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Martić leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇭🇷 Martić | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 400 |
| 🇮🇪 Hamilton | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MartićActive | HamiltonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| WTA singles titles | 1 | — |
| Grand Slam quarter-finals | 1 | — |
| Career high ranking | 14 | — |
| WTA finals reached | 4 | — |
| Seasons on tour | 18 | — |
| Wimbledon titles | — | 1 |
| Irish Championships titles | — | 2 |
| Grand Slam titles | — | 1 |
| Career span in years | — | 10 |
| Wimbledon finals | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 66 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 58 |
| Honours w20% | 66 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 78 |
Petra Martić leads with a GOAT score of 75.5 against 75.4 for Willoughby Hamilton — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hamilton scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Martić leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Martić: 75.5, Hamilton: 75.4.
Make your case for Martić vs Hamilton. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.