GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Schneider vs Hagino

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SchneiderWinner
82.3

Schneider wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Hagino
82.3

Hagino wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Swimming

Shareable URL · /compare/petra-schneider-vs-kosuke-hagino

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇩🇪 Petra Schneider
82.3

Schneider leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic 400 m medley champion in 1980 and double world champion in 1982.

1. Petra Schneider
82.3
2. Kosuke Hagino
82.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇩🇪 Petra Schneider5 seasons played · career day 1,825436 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇵 Kosuke Hagino5 seasons played · career day 1,82615 major golds
-96.6% vs Schneider at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇩🇪 Schneider0070156436590
🇯🇵 Hagino00141219

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSchneiderRetiredHaginoRetired
Olympic gold medals11
Olympic medals24
World Championship golds31
European Championship golds5
World records set5
Asian Games golds11
Pan Pacific golds4
Dominance w25%8482
Peak w20%9290
Longevity w20%6874
Honours w20%8282
Statistics w15%8684

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Schneider82.3
Hagino82.3
The people
Schneider
Hagino

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Schneider vs Hagino. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →