Who is better, Phelps or Andrusenko?
Michael Phelps leads with a GOAT score of 98.1 against 83.5 for Veronika Andrusenko — a gap of 14.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Michael Phelps above Veronika Andrusenko: 98.1 vs 83.5. Michael Phelps leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Phelps wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Andrusenko wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/phelps-vs-veronika-andrusenko
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Phelps leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Andrusenko — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | PhelpsRetired | AndrusenkoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 23 | — |
| Olympic medals | 28 | — |
| World titles (LC) | 26 | — |
| World records set | 39 | — |
| Olympic Games | 5 | — |
| Golds in one Games | 8 | — |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| European titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 2 |
| National titles | — | 10 |
| Relay finals | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 99 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 100 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 93 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 100 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 98 | 88 |
Michael Phelps leads with a GOAT score of 98.1 against 83.5 for Veronika Andrusenko — a gap of 14.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Andrusenko does not lead any of the five categories; Phelps is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Phelps: 98.1, Andrusenko: 83.5.
Make your case for Phelps vs Andrusenko. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.