GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Dalhausser vs Gamova

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GamovaWinner
85.4

Gamova wins: Dominance, Statistics

Dalhausser
85.0

Dalhausser wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Volleyball

Shareable URL · /compare/phil-dalhausser-vs-ekaterina-gamova

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇷🇺 Ekaterina Gamova
85.4

Gamova leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Two world titles and two Olympic silvers as Russia's dominant attacker.

1. Ekaterina Gamova
85.4
2. Phil Dalhausser
85.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Phil Dalhausser5 seasons played · career day 3,28628 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇷🇺 Ekaterina Gamova5 seasons played · career day 2,19027 titles
-3.6% vs Dalhausser at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Dalhausser0000228
🇷🇺 Gamova00032145

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricDalhausserRetiredGamovaRetired
Olympic golds1
World Championship titles12
FIVB tour wins34
AVP tour wins63
Olympic appearances4
Olympic medals2
European titles2
World Cup medals2
Champions League titles3
Dominance w25%8284
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%8482
Honours w20%8484
Statistics w15%8688

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Gamova85.4
Dalhausser85.0
The people
Dalhausser
Gamova

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Dalhausser vs Gamova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →