AthletesTeams
Sundhage vs Alshammar
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Cross-sport verdictgoatrank.world
AlshammarWinner
90.3Alshammar wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Sundhage
88.1Sundhage wins: Dominance
Candidates
Locked to FootballShareable URL · /compare/pia-sundhage-v-vs-therese-alshammar
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Cross-sport GOAT score
🇸🇪 Pia Sundhage
88.2
88.2 in-sport × 1.00 Global participation & competition depth
Sundhage leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Pia Sundhagedepth ×1.00
2. Therese Alshammardepth ×0.97
Category breakdown
Season form · season output
Career timeline · season output
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · season output1. 🇸🇪 Pia Sundhage5 seasons played · career day 1,825307 output
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Therese Alshammar5 seasons played · career day 2,556124.9 output
-59.3% vs Sundhage at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Sundhage | 0 | 0 | 52 | 109 | 307 | 636 |
| 🇸🇪 Alshammar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75.7 | 174.01 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SundhageRetired | AlshammarRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 96 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 94 |
| European Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Sweden caps | 146 | — |
| Sweden goals | 71 | — |
| Damallsvenskan titles | 6 | — |
| World Cup appearances | 2 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| World Championship golds | — | 5 |
| Olympic Games | — | 6 |
| 50 m freestyle best | — | 23.9 |
| World records | — | 3 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Alshammar90.3
Sundhage88.1
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Sundhage vs Alshammar. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.