Who is better, Heyhoe Flint or Richards?
Rachael Heyhoe Flint leads with a GOAT score of 90.2 against 90.2 for Viv Richards — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Rachael Heyhoe Flint and Viv Richards level at 90.2. Rachael Heyhoe Flint leads on Statistics, Peak. Viv Richards leads on Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Heyhoe Flint wins: Peak, Statistics
Richards wins: Dominance
Shareable URL · /compare/rachael-heyhoe-flint-vs-viv-richards
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Heyhoe Flint leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Heyhoe Flint | 0 | 0 | 20 | 48 | 122 | 392 |
| 🏴 Richards | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 316 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Heyhoe FlintRetired | RichardsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Tests played | 22 | — |
| Test runs | 1,594 | 8,540 |
| Test average | 45.54 | 50.23 |
| Tests as captain without defeat | 12 | — |
| Test centuries | — | 24 |
| World Cups | — | 2 |
| ODI runs | — | 6,721 |
| Wisden Cricketer of the Century | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 93 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteRachael Heyhoe Flint leads with a GOAT score of 90.2 against 90.2 for Viv Richards — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Richards scores higher on dominance. Heyhoe Flint leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Heyhoe Flint: 90.2, Richards: 90.2.
Make your case for Heyhoe Flint vs Richards. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.