Who is better, Heyhoe Flint or Younis?
Rachael Heyhoe Flint leads with a GOAT score of 90.2 against 90.0 for Younis Khan — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Rachael Heyhoe Flint above Younis Khan: 90.2 vs 90.0. Rachael Heyhoe Flint leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Younis Khan leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Heyhoe Flint wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Younis wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/rachael-heyhoe-flint-vs-younis-khan
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Heyhoe Flint leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Heyhoe Flint | 0 | 0 | 20 | 48 | 122 | 392 |
| 🇵🇰 Younis | 0 | 0 | 30 | 70 | 163 | 438 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Heyhoe FlintRetired | YounisRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Tests played | 22 | — |
| Test runs | 1,594 | 10,099 |
| Test average | 45.54 | — |
| Tests as captain without defeat | 12 | — |
| Test centuries | — | 34 |
| Test batting average | — | 52 |
| World T20 titles | — | 1 |
| Test matches | — | 118 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 94 |
Rachael Heyhoe Flint leads with a GOAT score of 90.2 against 90.0 for Younis Khan — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Younis scores higher on statistics, longevity. Heyhoe Flint leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Heyhoe Flint: 90.2, Younis: 90.0.
Make your case for Heyhoe Flint vs Younis. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.