Who is better, Korać or Swoopes?
Radivoj Korać leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.5 for Sheryl Swoopes — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Radivoj Korać above Sheryl Swoopes: 83.6 vs 83.5. Radivoj Korać leads on Statistics, Peak. Sheryl Swoopes leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Korać wins: Peak, Statistics
Swoopes wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/radivoj-korac-vs-sheryl-swoopes
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Korać leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇸 Korać | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 344 | 688 |
| 🇺🇸 Swoopes | 0 | 0 | 7.1 | 22.7 | 80.2 | 144.5 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KoraćRetired | SwoopesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| EuroLeague scoring records | 1 | — |
| European Championship medals | 3 | — |
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Career points for Yugoslavia | 3,153 | — |
| Seasons played | 12 | — |
| WNBA titles | — | 4 |
| WNBA MVP awards | — | 3 |
| Defensive Player of the Year | — | 3 |
| Olympic golds | — | 3 |
| All-Star selections | — | 6 |
| Scoring titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 84 |
Radivoj Korać leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.5 for Sheryl Swoopes — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Swoopes scores higher on honours, longevity. Korać leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Korać: 83.6, Swoopes: 83.5.
Make your case for Korać vs Swoopes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.