Who is better, Osuna or Murray?
Rafael Osuna leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.5 for Robert Lindley Murray — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Rafael Osuna and Robert Lindley Murray level at 81.5. Rafael Osuna leads on Longevity. Robert Lindley Murray leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Osuna wins: Longevity
Murray wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/rafael-osuna-vs-robert-lindley-murray
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Osuna leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇲🇽 Osuna | 0 | 0 | 40 | 99 | 272 | 575 |
| 🇺🇸 Murray | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 378 | 494 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | OsunaRetired | MurrayRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major singles titles | 1 | — |
| Major doubles titles | 2 | — |
| Davis Cup singles wins | 29 | — |
| World number one ranking years | 1 | — |
| Pan American gold medals | 2 | — |
| US singles titles | — | 2 |
| US finals | — | 2 |
| Seasons played | — | 7 |
| World number one rankings | — | 1 |
| Consecutive titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Rafael Osuna leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.5 for Robert Lindley Murray — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Murray scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. Osuna leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Osuna: 81.5, Murray: 81.5.
Make your case for Osuna vs Murray. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.