Who is better, Hveger or Sjöström?
Sarah Sjöström leads with a GOAT score of 88.6 against 88.2 for Ragnhild Hveger — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sarah Sjöström above Ragnhild Hveger: 88.6 vs 88.2. Sarah Sjöström leads on Longevity, Honours. Ragnhild Hveger leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sjöström wins: Longevity, Honours
Hveger wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ragnhild-hveger-vs-sarah-sjostrom
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sjöström leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 Hveger | 0 | 0 | 70 | 158 | 351 | 666 |
| 🇸🇪 Sjöström | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 32 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HvegerRetired | SjöströmActive |
|---|---|---|
| World records | 42 | 6 |
| Olympic silver medals | 1 | — |
| European Championship golds | 5 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 2 | — |
| Danish national titles | 40 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 3 |
| Olympic medals | — | 7 |
| World Championship golds | — | 12 |
| 50 m freestyle best (s) | — | 23.61 |
| European golds | — | 26 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 93 | 90 |
Sarah Sjöström leads with a GOAT score of 88.6 against 88.2 for Ragnhild Hveger — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hveger scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Sjöström leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hveger: 88.2, Sjöström: 88.6.
Make your case for Hveger vs Sjöström. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.