GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

McDaniel vs Bailey

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
McDanielWinner
89.8

McDaniel wins: no category outright

Bailey
89.8

Bailey wins: no category outright

Candidates
Locked to American Football

Shareable URL · /compare/randall-mcdaniel-vs-champ-bailey

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Randall McDaniel
89.8

McDaniel leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories. Twelve Pro Bowls and 202 consecutive starts as a Vikings guard.

1. Randall McDaniel
89.8
2. Champ Bailey
89.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Touchdowns per season

Career timeline · Touchdowns per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Touchdowns per season
1. 🇺🇸 Randall McDaniel5 seasons played · career day 1,826334 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Champ Bailey5 seasons played · career day 1,825334 touchdowns
0.0% vs McDaniel at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 McDaniel0055116256693
🇺🇸 Bailey0055116334693

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMcDanielRetiredBaileyRetired
Pro Bowls1212
Consecutive starts202
All-Pro selections7
Seasons played1415
Games played223
Interceptions52
Passes defended203
First-team All-Pro selections3
Dominance w25%8888
Peak w20%9292
Longevity w20%9090
Honours w20%8888
Statistics w15%9292

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
McDaniel89.8
Bailey89.8
The people
McDaniel
Bailey

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for McDaniel vs Bailey. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →