Who is better, Stoklos or Smith?
Sinjin Smith leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 87.8 for Randy Stoklos — a gap of 1.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Stoklos vs Smith
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sinjin Smith above Randy Stoklos: 89.1 vs 87.8. Sinjin Smith leads on Dominance, Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SmithWinner
89.1Smith wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Stoklos
87.8Stoklos wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to VolleyballShareable URL · /compare/randy-stoklos-vs-sinjin-smith
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Sinjin Smith
89.1
Smith leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Sinjin Smith
2. Randy Stoklos
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Sinjin Smith5 seasons played · career day 1,82530 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Randy Stoklos5 seasons played · career day 1,82527 titles
-10.0% vs Smith at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Stoklos | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 63 |
| 🇺🇸 Smith | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 30 | 66 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Smith89.1
Stoklos87.8
FAQ
Where does Stoklos beat Smith?
Stoklos does not lead any of the five categories; Smith is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Stoklos vs Smith score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Stoklos: 87.8, Smith: 89.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Stoklos vs Smith. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.