Who is better, Ashwin or Broad?
Ravichandran Ashwin leads with a GOAT score of 90.5 against 90.5 for Stuart Broad — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Ashwin vs Broad
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Ravichandran Ashwin and Stuart Broad level at 90.5. Ravichandran Ashwin leads on Dominance, Statistics. Stuart Broad leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AshwinWinner
90.5Ashwin wins: Dominance, Statistics
Broad
90.5Broad wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/ravichandran-ashwin-vs-stuart-broad
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇳 Ravichandran Ashwin
90.5
Ashwin leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Ravichandran Ashwin
2. Stuart Broad
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇮🇳 Ravichandran Ashwin5 years played · career day 2,190196 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Stuart Broad5 years played · career day 2,556187 runs
-4.6% vs Ashwin at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇳 Ashwin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 134 | 331 |
| 🇬🇧 Broad | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 106 | 265 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Ashwin90.5
Broad90.5
FAQ
Where does Broad beat Ashwin?
Broad scores higher on longevity. Ashwin leads on dominance, statistics.
How is the Ashwin vs Broad score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ashwin: 90.5, Broad: 90.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Ashwin vs Broad. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.