GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Marino vs Gauff

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GauffWinner
72.5

Gauff wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Marino
70.9

Marino wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/rebecca-marino-vs-coco-gauff

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Coco Gauff
72.5

Gauff leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. US Open and Roland Garros champion and a WTA Finals winner before 21.

1. Coco Gauff
72.5
2. Rebecca Marino
70.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇦 Rebecca Marino5 seasons played · career day 2,191728 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Coco Gauff5 seasons played · career day 1,8258 titles
-98.9% vs Marino at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇦 Marino0003004681,678
🇺🇸 Gauff0011812

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMarinoActiveGauffActive
Highest WTA singles ranking38
ITF singles titles10
Grand Slam third rounds1
Billie Jean King Cup ties12
Professional years15
Grand Slam titles2
WTA Finals titles1
Career singles titles11
Best world ranking2
Grand Slam doubles titles1
Dominance w25%6074
Peak w20%8086
Longevity w20%7852
Honours w20%6072
Statistics w15%8280

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Gauff72.5
Marino70.9
The people
Marino
Gauff

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Marino vs Gauff. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →