Who is better, Faber or Turner?
Trea Turner leads with a GOAT score of 86.7 against 86.6 for Red Faber — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Trea Turner above Red Faber: 86.7 vs 86.6. Trea Turner leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Red Faber leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Turner wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Faber wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/red-faber-vs-trea-turner
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Turner leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Faber | 0 | 0 | 10 | 34 | 71 | 151 |
| 🇺🇸 Turner | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.342 | 1.195 | 2.422 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FaberRetired | TurnerActive · Philadelphia Phillies |
|---|---|---|
| World Series titles | 1 | 1 |
| Career wins | 254 | — |
| Career innings pitched | 4,086 | — |
| ERA titles | 2 | — |
| Career strikeouts | 1,471 | — |
| Batting titles | — | 1 |
| Silver Sluggers | — | 2 |
| Career stolen bases | — | 300 |
| All-Star selections | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 94 |
Trea Turner leads with a GOAT score of 86.7 against 86.6 for Red Faber — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Faber scores higher on longevity. Turner leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Faber: 86.6, Turner: 86.7.
Make your case for Faber vs Turner. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.