GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Halmich vs Crawford

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HalmichWinner
86.4

Halmich wins: Longevity

Crawford
86.4

Crawford wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Boxing

Shareable URL · /compare/regina-halmich-vs-terence-crawford

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇩🇪 Regina Halmich
86.4

Halmich leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Dominated women's flyweight boxing with 54 wins and long title reigns.

1. Regina Halmich
86.4
2. Terence Crawford
86.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇩🇪 Regina Halmich5 years played · career day 1,82529 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Terence Crawford5 years played · career day 2,19119 title wins
-34.5% vs Halmich at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇩🇪 Halmich006132944
🇺🇸 Crawford00051227

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHalmichRetiredCrawfordActive
World title defences44
Professional wins5441
Professional losses1
Knockouts16
Professional bouts56
Career losses0
Wins by knockout31
World titles in weight classes4
Undisputed titles2
Dominance w25%8688
Peak w20%9092
Longevity w20%8478
Honours w20%8686
Statistics w15%8688

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Halmich86.4
Crawford86.4
The people
Halmich
Crawford

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Halmich vs Crawford. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →