Who is better, Halmich or Crawford?
Regina Halmich leads with a GOAT score of 86.4 against 86.4 for Terence Crawford — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Regina Halmich and Terence Crawford level at 86.4. Regina Halmich leads on Longevity. Terence Crawford leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Halmich wins: Longevity
Crawford wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/regina-halmich-vs-terence-crawford
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Halmich leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Halmich | 0 | 0 | 6 | 13 | 29 | 44 |
| 🇺🇸 Crawford | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 27 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HalmichRetired | CrawfordActive |
|---|---|---|
| World title defences | 44 | — |
| Professional wins | 54 | 41 |
| Professional losses | 1 | — |
| Knockouts | 16 | — |
| Professional bouts | 56 | — |
| Career losses | — | 0 |
| Wins by knockout | — | 31 |
| World titles in weight classes | — | 4 |
| Undisputed titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Regina Halmich leads with a GOAT score of 86.4 against 86.4 for Terence Crawford — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Crawford scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Halmich leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Halmich: 86.4, Crawford: 86.4.
Make your case for Halmich vs Crawford. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.