Who is better, Torres or Tr. Crabb?
Regla Torres leads with a GOAT score of 82.1 against 82.0 for Trevor Crabb — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Regla Torres above Trevor Crabb: 82.1 vs 82.0. Regla Torres leads on Honours, Dominance. Trevor Crabb leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Torres wins: Dominance, Honours
Tr. Crabb wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/regla-torres-vs-trevor-crabb
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Torres leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇺 Torres | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 51 |
| 🇺🇸 Tr. Crabb | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 301 | 635 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | TorresRetired | Tr. CrabbActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 3 | — |
| World Championship titles | 2 | — |
| World Cup titles | 2 | — |
| Grand Prix titles | 4 | — |
| Player of the Century | 1 | — |
| MVP awards | 3 | — |
| AVP titles | — | 9 |
| World Tour medals | — | 3 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| AVP finals | — | 18 |
| National team years | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 86 |
Regla Torres leads with a GOAT score of 82.1 against 82.0 for Trevor Crabb — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Tr. Crabb scores higher on statistics, longevity. Torres leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Torres: 82.1, Tr. Crabb: 82.0.
Make your case for Torres vs Tr. Crabb. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.