Who is better, Zamora or Adams?
Ricardo Zamora leads with a GOAT score of 84.8 against 84.8 for Tony Adams — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Zamora vs Adams
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Ricardo Zamora and Tony Adams level at 84.8. Ricardo Zamora leads on Statistics, Peak. Tony Adams leads on Honours, Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ZamoraWinner
84.8Zamora wins: Peak, Statistics
Adams
84.8Adams wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Candidates
Locked to FootballShareable URL · /compare/ricardo-zamora-vs-tony-adams
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇪🇸 Ricardo Zamora
84.8
Zamora leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Ricardo Zamora
2. Tony Adams
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🏴 Tony Adams5 seasons played · career day 2,191372 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇪🇸 Ricardo Zamora5 seasons played · career day 3,28770 goals
-81.2% vs Adams at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇸 Zamora | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70 |
| 🏴 Adams | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 286 | 630 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Zamora84.8
Adams84.8
FAQ
Where does Adams beat Zamora?
Adams scores higher on dominance, honours, longevity. Zamora leads on peak, statistics.
How is the Zamora vs Adams score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Zamora: 84.8, Adams: 84.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Zamora vs Adams. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.