GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Seymour vs Watt

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SeymourWinner
85.4

Seymour wins: Longevity, Honours

Watt
85.3

Watt wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to American Football

Shareable URL · /compare/richard-seymour-vs-jj-watt

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Richard Seymour
85.4

Seymour leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Three Super Bowl titles as the anchor of the Patriots' defensive front.

1. Richard Seymour
85.4
2. J.J. Watt
85.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Touchdowns per season

Career timeline · Touchdowns per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Touchdowns per season
1. 🇺🇸 J.J. Watt5 seasons played · career day 1,82574.5 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Richard Seymour5 seasons played · career day 1,82524.5 touchdowns
-67.1% vs Watt at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Seymour0038.524.547
🇺🇸 Watt005.52674.596

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSeymourRetiredWattRetired
Super Bowl titles3
Pro Bowls75
Career sacks57.5114.5
First-team All-Pro selections3
Seasons played12
Defensive Player of the Year3
All-Pro First Teams5
20-sack seasons2
Forced fumbles27
Dominance w25%8284
Peak w20%9092
Longevity w20%8278
Honours w20%8884
Statistics w15%8690

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Seymour85.4
Watt85.3
The people
Seymour
Watt

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Seymour vs Watt. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →