GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Benaud vs Misbah

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MisbahWinner
85.9

Misbah wins: Longevity, Statistics

Benaud
85.8

Benaud wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/richie-benaud-vs-misbah-ul-haq

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇵🇰 Misbah-ul-Haq
85.9

Misbah leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Pakistan's most successful Test captain, taking the side to number one in 2016.

1. Misbah-ul-Haq
85.9
2. Richie Benaud
85.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇦🇺 Richie Benaud5 years played · career day 1,826252 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇵🇰 Misbah-ul-Haq5 years played · career day 2,921150 runs
-40.5% vs Benaud at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Benaud003578186590
🇵🇰 Misbah000044194

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBenaudRetiredMisbahRetired
Test wickets248
Test runs2,2015,222
Tests as captain28
Series lost as captain0
Five-wicket hauls16
Test wins as captain26
Test centuries10
Test average46.62
Fastest Test fifty (balls)21
Dominance w25%8482
Peak w20%9290
Longevity w20%8086
Honours w20%8682
Statistics w15%8892

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Misbah85.9
Benaud85.8
The people
Benaud
Misbah

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Benaud vs Misbah. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →