Who is better, Jackson or Mack?
Rickey Jackson leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.6 for Tom Mack — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Jackson vs Mack
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Rickey Jackson and Tom Mack level at 87.6. Rickey Jackson leads on Peak. Tom Mack leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
JacksonWinner
87.6Jackson wins: Peak
Mack
87.6Mack wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/rickey-jackson-vs-tom-mack
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Rickey Jackson
87.6
Jackson leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Rickey Jackson
2. Tom Mack
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Rickey Jackson5 seasons played · career day 1,825342 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Tom Mack5 seasons played · career day 1,825314 touchdowns
-8.2% vs Jackson at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Jackson | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 342 | 692 |
| 🇺🇸 Mack | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 314 | 666 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Jackson87.6
Mack87.6
FAQ
Where does Mack beat Jackson?
Mack scores higher on longevity. Jackson leads on peak.
How is the Jackson vs Mack score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jackson: 87.6, Mack: 87.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Jackson vs Mack. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.