Who is better, Gronkowski or Kiesling?
Walt Kiesling leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.1 for Rob Gronkowski — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Walt Kiesling above Rob Gronkowski: 84.2 vs 84.1. Walt Kiesling leads on Longevity. Rob Gronkowski leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kiesling wins: Longevity
Gronkowski wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/rob-gronkowski-vs-walt-kiesling
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kiesling leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Gronkowski | 0 | 0 | 10 | 27 | 54 | 79 |
| 🇺🇸 Kiesling | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 304 | 644 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GronkowskiRetired | KieslingRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Super Bowl titles | 4 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 5 | — |
| All-Pro First Teams | 4 | — |
| Receiving touchdowns | 92 | — |
| Receiving yards | 9,286 | — |
| Single-season TD record (TE) | 17 | — |
| NFL titles | — | 1 |
| All-Pro selections | — | 2 |
| Seasons played | — | 13 |
| Games played | — | 132 |
| Teams played for | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Walt Kiesling leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.1 for Rob Gronkowski — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gronkowski scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Kiesling leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gronkowski: 84.1, Kiesling: 84.2.
Make your case for Gronkowski vs Kiesling. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.