Who is better, Murray or Smith?
Robert Lindley Murray leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.5 for Stan Smith — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Robert Lindley Murray and Stan Smith level at 81.5. Robert Lindley Murray leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak. Stan Smith leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Murray wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Smith wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/robert-lindley-murray-vs-stan-smith
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Murray leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Murray | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 378 | 494 |
| 🇺🇸 Smith | 0 | 0 | 48 | 108 | 263 | 688 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MurrayRetired | SmithRetired |
|---|---|---|
| US singles titles | 2 | — |
| US finals | 2 | — |
| Seasons played | 7 | — |
| World number one rankings | 1 | — |
| Consecutive titles | 2 | — |
| Major singles titles | — | 2 |
| Major doubles titles | — | 5 |
| Davis Cup titles | — | 7 |
| Career singles titles | — | 39 |
| Year-end world number one | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 80 |
Robert Lindley Murray leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.5 for Stan Smith — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Smith scores higher on longevity. Murray leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Murray: 81.5, Smith: 81.5.
Make your case for Murray vs Smith. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.