Who is better, Backhaus or McIntosh?
Robin Backhaus leads with a GOAT score of 81.8 against 81.7 for Summer McIntosh — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Robin Backhaus above Summer McIntosh: 81.8 vs 81.7. Robin Backhaus leads on Longevity, Honours. Summer McIntosh leads on Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Backhaus wins: Longevity, Honours
McIntosh wins: Dominance, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/robin-backhaus-vs-summer-mcintosh
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Backhaus leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Backhaus | 0 | 0 | 50 | 124 | 368 | 418 |
| 🇨🇦 McIntosh | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 823 | 1,363.5 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BackhausRetired | McIntoshActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | 6 |
| US titles | 4 | — |
| NCAA titles | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 3 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 4 |
| World Championship golds | — | 7 |
| World records | — | 4 |
| 400 m medley record (s) | — | 270 |
| Commonwealth golds | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 90 |
Robin Backhaus leads with a GOAT score of 81.8 against 81.7 for Summer McIntosh — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McIntosh scores higher on dominance, statistics. Backhaus leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Backhaus: 81.8, McIntosh: 81.7.
Make your case for Backhaus vs McIntosh. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.