Who is better, Söderling or Austin?
Robin Söderling leads with a GOAT score of 77.3 against 77.2 for Tracy Austin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Robin Söderling above Tracy Austin: 77.3 vs 77.2. Robin Söderling leads on Longevity, Statistics. Tracy Austin leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Söderling wins: Longevity, Statistics
Austin wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/robin-soderling-vs-tracy-austin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Söderling leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Söderling | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 11 |
| 🇺🇸 Austin | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 25 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SöderlingRetired | AustinRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam finals | 2 | — |
| ATP titles | 10 | — |
| Career-high ranking | 4 | — |
| Masters 1000 finals | 2 | — |
| Wins over world No. 1 | 2 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 2 |
| Weeks at No. 1 | — | 22 |
| WTA titles | — | 30 |
| WTA Finals titles | — | 1 |
| Age at first major | — | 16 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 56 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 80 |
Robin Söderling leads with a GOAT score of 77.3 against 77.2 for Tracy Austin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Austin scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Söderling leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Söderling: 77.3, Austin: 77.2.
Make your case for Söderling vs Austin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.