Who is better, Söderling or Zheng?
Zheng Qinwen leads with a GOAT score of 77.4 against 77.3 for Robin Söderling — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Söderling vs Zheng
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Zheng Qinwen above Robin Söderling: 77.4 vs 77.3. Zheng Qinwen leads on Honours, Dominance. Robin Söderling leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ZhengWinner
77.4Zheng wins: Dominance, Honours
Söderling
77.3Söderling wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to TennisShareable URL · /compare/robin-soderling-vs-zheng-qinwen
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Zheng Qinwen
77.4
Zheng leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Zheng Qinwen
2. Robin Söderling
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇳 Zheng Qinwen5 seasons played · career day 2,55616 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Robin Söderling5 seasons played · career day 2,5557 titles
-56.2% vs Zheng at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Söderling | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 11 |
| 🇨🇳 Zheng | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 16 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Zheng77.4
Söderling77.3
FAQ
Where does Söderling beat Zheng?
Söderling scores higher on longevity. Zheng leads on dominance, honours.
How is the Söderling vs Zheng score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Söderling: 77.3, Zheng: 77.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Söderling vs Zheng. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.