GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Heath vs Paolini

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HeathWinner
77.2

Heath wins: Longevity

Paolini
76.9

Paolini wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/rodney-heath-vs-jasmine-paolini

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Rodney Heath
77.2

Heath leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Won the first Australasian Championships in 1905 and again in 1910.

1. Rodney Heath
77.2
2. Jasmine Paolini
76.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇮🇹 Jasmine Paolini5 seasons played · career day 2,9217 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Rodney Heath5 seasons played · career day 1,8252 titles
-71.4% vs Paolini at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Heath002224
🇮🇹 Paolini0000210

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHeathRetiredPaoliniActive
Australian titles2
Australian doubles titles1
Grand Slam titles3
Career span in years15
Australian finals2
Grand Slam finals2
Olympic golds1
Billie Jean King Cup titles2
WTA titles4
Career-high ranking4
Dominance w25%7074
Peak w20%8888
Longevity w20%7666
Honours w20%7678
Statistics w15%7880

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Heath77.2
Paolini76.9
The people
Heath
Paolini

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Heath vs Paolini. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →