Who is better, Hornsby or Greinke?
Rogers Hornsby leads with a GOAT score of 89.5 against 89.5 for Zack Greinke — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Rogers Hornsby and Zack Greinke level at 89.5. Rogers Hornsby leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak. Zack Greinke leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hornsby wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Greinke wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/rogers-hornsby-vs-zack-greinke
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hornsby leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Hornsby | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.313 | 1.239 | 2.791 |
| 🇺🇸 Greinke | 0 | 0 | 8 | 13 | 20 | 90 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HornsbyRetired | GreinkeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Batting titles | 7 | — |
| Triple Crowns | 2 | — |
| MVP awards | 2 | — |
| Career batting average | 0.358 | — |
| World Series titles | 1 | — |
| Career hits | 2,930 | — |
| Cy Young awards | — | 1 |
| Career wins | — | 225 |
| Career strikeouts | — | 2,979 |
| Gold Gloves | — | 6 |
| All-Star selections | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 95 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 94 |
Rogers Hornsby leads with a GOAT score of 89.5 against 89.5 for Zack Greinke — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Greinke scores higher on honours, longevity. Hornsby leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hornsby: 89.5, Greinke: 89.5.
Make your case for Hornsby vs Greinke. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.