Who is better, Rohit or Saqlain?
Rohit Sharma leads with a GOAT score of 84.8 against 84.8 for Saqlain Mushtaq — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Rohit Sharma and Saqlain Mushtaq level at 84.8. Rohit Sharma leads on Longevity, Honours. Saqlain Mushtaq leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Rohit wins: Longevity, Honours
Saqlain wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/rohit-sharma-vs-saqlain-mushtaq
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Rohit leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇳 Rohit | 0 | 0 | 0 | 400 | 2,300 | 5,440 |
| 🇵🇰 Saqlain | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 180 | 328 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RohitActive · Mumbai Indians | SaqlainRetired |
|---|---|---|
| ODI runs | 11,000 | — |
| ODI centuries | 32 | — |
| T20 World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| ODI double centuries | 3 | — |
| IPL titles as captain | 5 | — |
| Test wickets | — | 208 |
| ODI wickets | — | 288 |
| Fastest to 100 ODI wickets (matches) | — | 53 |
| Five-wicket hauls | — | 13 |
| Tests played | — | 49 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 92 |
Rohit Sharma leads with a GOAT score of 84.8 against 84.8 for Saqlain Mushtaq — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Saqlain scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Rohit leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Rohit: 84.8, Saqlain: 84.8.
Make your case for Rohit vs Saqlain. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.