GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Matthes vs De Bruijn

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MatthesWinner
89.6

Matthes wins: Dominance

De Bruijn
89.5

De Bruijn wins: Peak

Candidates
Locked to Swimming

Shareable URL · /compare/roland-matthes-vs-inge-de-bruijn

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇩🇪 Roland Matthes
89.6

Matthes leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Unbeaten in backstroke for seven years and a four-time Olympic champion.

1. Roland Matthes
89.6
2. Inge de Bruijn
89.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇳🇱 Inge de Bruijn5 seasons played · career day 3,65218 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇩🇪 Roland Matthes5 seasons played · career day 1,82513 major golds
-27.8% vs De Bruijn at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇩🇪 Matthes00131325
🇳🇱 De Bruijn0000013

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMatthesRetiredDe BruijnRetired
Olympic gold medals4
Olympic medals88
World records19
World Championship golds35
Years unbeaten in backstroke7
Olympic golds4
World records set11
European titles9
Dominance w25%9290
Peak w20%9496
Longevity w20%8080
Honours w20%9090
Statistics w15%9292

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Matthes89.6
De Bruijn89.5
The people
Matthes
De Bruijn

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Matthes vs De Bruijn. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →