Who is better, Francis or Tretiak?
Ron Francis leads with a GOAT score of 90.6 against 90.5 for Vladislav Tretiak — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ron Francis above Vladislav Tretiak: 90.6 vs 90.5. Ron Francis leads on Longevity, Statistics. Vladislav Tretiak leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Francis wins: Longevity, Statistics
Tretiak wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ron-francis-vs-vladislav-tretiak
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Francis leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Francis | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 265 | 552 |
| 🇷🇺 Tretiak | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 18 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FrancisRetired | TretiakRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Career points | 1,798 | — |
| Career assists | 1,249 | — |
| Stanley Cups | 2 | — |
| Games played | 1,731 | — |
| Selke Trophies | 1 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 3 |
| World Championship golds | — | 10 |
| Soviet league titles | — | 13 |
| Soviet Player of the Year awards | — | 5 |
| Olympic medals | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 96 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 90 |
Ron Francis leads with a GOAT score of 90.6 against 90.5 for Vladislav Tretiak — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Tretiak scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Francis leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Francis: 90.6, Tretiak: 90.5.
Make your case for Francis vs Tretiak. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.