Who is better, Ronaldo or Gartenmann?
Cristiano Ronaldo leads with a GOAT score of 95.5 against 17.6 for Stefan Gartenmann — a gap of 77.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Cristiano Ronaldo above Stefan Gartenmann: 95.5 vs 17.6. Cristiano Ronaldo leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ronaldo wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Gartenmann wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/ronaldo-vs-ros-stefan-gartenmann
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ronaldo leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Gartenmann — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Gartenmann — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | RonaldoActive · Al-Nassr FC | GartenmannActive · UC Sampdoria |
|---|---|---|
| Career goals | 924 | — |
| Career assists | 260 | — |
| Ballon d'Or | 5 | — |
| World Cups | 0 | — |
| Champions League titles | 5 | — |
| League titles | 7 | — |
| Goals per 90 | 0.71 | — |
| Shirt number | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 17.8 |
| Peak w20% | 95 | 22.4 |
| Longevity w20% | 99 | 15.8 |
| Honours w20% | 93 | 13.8 |
| Statistics w15% | 97 | 18.1 |
Cristiano Ronaldo leads with a GOAT score of 95.5 against 17.6 for Stefan Gartenmann — a gap of 77.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gartenmann does not lead any of the five categories; Ronaldo is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ronaldo: 95.5, Gartenmann: 17.6.
Make your case for Ronaldo vs Gartenmann. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.