Who is better, Burns or Crawley?
Zak Crawley leads with a GOAT score of 78.5 against 78.0 for Rory Burns — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Burns vs Crawley
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Zak Crawley above Rory Burns: 78.5 vs 78.0. Zak Crawley leads on Peak, Honours. Rory Burns leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CrawleyWinner
78.5Crawley wins: Peak, Honours
Burns
78.0Burns wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/rory-burns-vs-zak-crawley
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Zak Crawley
78.5
Crawley leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Zak Crawley
2. Rory Burns
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Zak Crawley5 years played · career day 1,825369 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Rory Burns5 years played · career day 1,825282 runs
-23.6% vs Crawley at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Burns | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 282 | 608 |
| 🇬🇧 Crawley | 0 | 0 | 45 | 106 | 369 | 701 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Crawley78.5
Burns78.0
FAQ
Where does Burns beat Crawley?
Burns scores higher on statistics, longevity. Crawley leads on peak, honours.
How is the Burns vs Crawley score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Burns: 78.0, Crawley: 78.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Burns vs Crawley. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.