Who is better, Afridi or Dube?
Abbas Afridi leads with a GOAT score of 48.4 against 47.0 for Shivam Dube — a gap of 1.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Afridi vs Dube
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Abbas Afridi above Shivam Dube: 48.4 vs 47.0. Abbas Afridi leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance. Shivam Dube leads on Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AfridiWinner
48.4Afridi wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Dube
47.0Dube wins: Longevity, Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/ros-abbas-afridi-vs-ros-shivam-dube
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🏳️ Abbas Afridi
48.4
Afridi leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Abbas Afridi
2. Shivam Dube
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🏳️ Shivam Dube5 years played · career day 1,8251,267 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ Abbas Afridi5 years played · career day 1,825101 runs
-92.0% vs Dube at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Afridi | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 101 | 101 |
| 🏳️ Dube | 0 | 0 | 113 | 283 | 1,267 | 2,407 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Afridi48.4
Dube47.0
FAQ
Where does Dube beat Afridi?
Dube scores higher on honours, longevity. Afridi leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
How is the Afridi vs Dube score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Afridi: 48.4, Dube: 47.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Afridi vs Dube. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.