Who is better, Zampa or Stirling?
Adam Zampa leads with a GOAT score of 67.3 against 67.2 for Paul Stirling — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Zampa vs Stirling
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ZampaWinner
67.3Zampa wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Stirling
67.2Stirling wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/ros-adam-zampa-vs-ros-paul-stirling
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🏳️ Adam Zampa
67.3
Zampa leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Adam Zampa
2. Paul Stirling
Category breakdown
Season form · Centuries per year
Career timeline · Centuries per year
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Centuries per year1. 🏳️ Paul Stirling5 years played · career day 1,826723 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ Adam Zampa5 years played · career day 1,826166 runs
-77.0% vs Stirling at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Zampa | 0 | 0 | 59 | 83 | 126 | 335 |
| 🏳️ Stirling | 0 | 0 | 4 | 51 | 414 | 1,559 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Zampa67.3
Stirling67.2
FAQ
Where does Stirling beat Zampa?
Stirling scores higher on longevity. Zampa leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
How is the Zampa vs Stirling score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Zampa: 67.3, Stirling: 67.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Zampa vs Stirling. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.