Who is better, Horford or McCollum?
Al Horford leads with a GOAT score of 59.2 against 59.2 for CJ McCollum — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Horford wins: Longevity, Honours
McCollum wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-al-horford-vs-ros-cj-mccollum
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Horford leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Horford | 0 | 0 | 818 | 1,588 | 3,916 | 8,280 |
| 🏳️ McCollum | 0 | 0 | 201 | 623 | 5,860 | 12,710 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HorfordActive · Golden State Warriors | McCollumActive · Atlanta Hawks |
|---|---|---|
| NBA games | 1,183 | 1,001 |
| NBA points | 15,075 | 19,626 |
| NBA award: All-Defensive 2nd Team | 1 | — |
| NBA award: All-NBA 3rd Team | 1 | — |
| NBA award: All-Rookie 1st Team | 1 | — |
| Number | 20 | 3 |
| NBA award: Most Improved Player | — | 1 |
| NBA award: NBA Most Improved Player Award | — | 1 |
| Patriot League Men's Basketball Player of the Year | — | 2x |
| NBA Most Improved Player Award | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 50.9 | 53.2 |
| Peak w20% | 63.8 | 74.5 |
| Longevity w20% | 75 | 66.6 |
| Honours w20% | 38 | 32 |
| Statistics w15% | 73.8 | 74.9 |
Al Horford leads with a GOAT score of 59.2 against 59.2 for CJ McCollum — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McCollum scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Horford leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Horford: 59.2, McCollum: 59.2.
Make your case for Horford vs McCollum. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.