Who is better, Suárez or Marte?
Albert Suárez leads with a GOAT score of 47.9 against 47.9 for Noelvi Marte — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Suárez wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Marte wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-albert-suarez-vs-ros-noelvi-marte
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Suárez leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Suárez | 0 | 0 | 54 | 88 | 88 | 196 |
| 🏳️ Marte | 0 | 0 | 36 | 84 | 209 | 209 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SuárezActive · Baltimore Orioles | MarteActive · Cincinnati Reds |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 104 | 254 |
| MLB wins | 16 | — |
| MLB strikeouts | 247 | — |
| MLB award: TEX Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: TEX Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| Number | 49 | — |
| MLB hits | — | 209 |
| MLB home runs | — | 27 |
| MLB award: DSL Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Baseball America DSL All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: DSL Post-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: CAL Post-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 48.1 | 50 |
| Peak w20% | 58.3 | 50.1 |
| Longevity w20% | 41 | 37.8 |
| Honours w20% | 38 | 50 |
| Statistics w15% | 56.3 | 52.4 |
Albert Suárez leads with a GOAT score of 47.9 against 47.9 for Noelvi Marte — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Marte scores higher on dominance, honours. Suárez leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Suárez: 47.9, Marte: 47.9.
Make your case for Suárez vs Marte. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.