Who is better, Protas or Fetisov?
Viacheslav Fetisov leads with a GOAT score of 92.1 against 15.3 for Aliaksei Protas — a gap of 76.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Viacheslav Fetisov above Aliaksei Protas: 92.1 vs 15.3. Viacheslav Fetisov leads on Honours, Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fetisov wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Protas wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-aliaksei-protas-vs-viacheslav-fetisov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fetisov leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Protas — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Protas | 0 | 0 | 9 | 24 | 171 | 171 |
| 🇷🇺 Fetisov | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 297 | 620 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ProtasActive · Washington Capitals | FetisovRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NHL games | 321 | — |
| NHL goals | 68 | — |
| NHL assists | 103 | — |
| NHL points | 171 | — |
| Number | 21 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| World Championship titles | — | 7 |
| Stanley Cups | — | 2 |
| Soviet league titles | — | 13 |
| Golden Stick awards | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 15.1 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 20.3 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 13.1 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 11.1 | 96 |
| Statistics w15% | 17.4 | 88 |
Viacheslav Fetisov leads with a GOAT score of 92.1 against 15.3 for Aliaksei Protas — a gap of 76.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Protas does not lead any of the five categories; Fetisov is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Protas: 15.3, Fetisov: 92.1.
Make your case for Protas vs Fetisov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.