Who is better, Vasilevskiy or Hellebuyck?
Connor Hellebuyck leads with a GOAT score of 65.7 against 64.3 for Andrei Vasilevskiy — a gap of 1.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Hellebuyck wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Vasilevskiy wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-andrei-vasilevskiy-vs-ros-connor-hellebuyck
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hellebuyck leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Vasilevskiy | 0 | 0 | 7 | 18 | 124 | 263 |
| 🏳️ Hellebuyck | 0 | 0 | 13 | 39 | 148 | 275 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | VasilevskiyActive · Tampa Bay Lightning | HellebuyckActive · Winnipeg Jets |
|---|---|---|
| NHL games | 598 | 625 |
| NHL wins | 370 | 345 |
| NHL award: Stanley Cup | 2 | — |
| NHL award: Conn Smythe Trophy | 1 | — |
| NHL award: Vezina Trophy | 2 | 3 |
| Order of Honour | 1 | — |
| Honoured Master of Sports of Russia | 1 | — |
| Order of Salavat Yulayev | 1 | — |
| Number | 88 | 37 |
| NHL award: Hart Memorial Trophy | — | 1 |
| NHL award: William M. Jennings Trophy | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 62.2 | 65.5 |
| Peak w20% | 74.5 | 75 |
| Longevity w20% | 63.4 | 60.2 |
| Honours w20% | 50 | 56 |
| Statistics w15% | 74.5 | 74 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteConnor Hellebuyck leads with a GOAT score of 65.7 against 64.3 for Andrei Vasilevskiy — a gap of 1.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Vasilevskiy scores higher on statistics, longevity. Hellebuyck leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Vasilevskiy: 64.3, Hellebuyck: 65.7.
Make your case for Vasilevskiy vs Hellebuyck. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.