Who is better, Vasilevskiy or O'Reilly?
Andrei Vasilevskiy leads with a GOAT score of 64.3 against 63.8 for Ryan O'Reilly — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Vasilevskiy wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
O'Reilly wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-andrei-vasilevskiy-vs-ros-ryan-o-reilly
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Vasilevskiy leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Vasilevskiy | 0 | 0 | 7 | 18 | 124 | 263 |
| 🏳️ O'Reilly | 0 | 0 | 26 | 52 | 191 | 422 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | VasilevskiyActive · Tampa Bay Lightning | O'ReillyActive · Nashville Predators |
|---|---|---|
| NHL games | 598 | 1,233 |
| NHL wins | 370 | — |
| NHL award: Stanley Cup | 2 | 1 |
| NHL award: Conn Smythe Trophy | 1 | 1 |
| NHL award: Vezina Trophy | 2 | — |
| Order of Honour | 1 | — |
| Honoured Master of Sports of Russia | 1 | — |
| Order of Salavat Yulayev | 1 | — |
| Number | 88 | 90 |
| NHL goals | — | 328 |
| NHL assists | — | 570 |
| NHL points | — | 898 |
| NHL award: Frank J. Selke Trophy | — | 1 |
| NHL award: Lady Byng Memorial Trophy | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 62.2 | 57.9 |
| Peak w20% | 74.5 | 71.7 |
| Longevity w20% | 63.4 | 75 |
| Honours w20% | 50 | 44 |
| Statistics w15% | 74.5 | 74.5 |
Andrei Vasilevskiy leads with a GOAT score of 64.3 against 63.8 for Ryan O'Reilly — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
O'Reilly scores higher on longevity. Vasilevskiy leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Vasilevskiy: 64.3, O'Reilly: 63.8.
Make your case for Vasilevskiy vs O'Reilly. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.