Who is better, Chaparro or Taylor?
Andrés Chaparro leads with a GOAT score of 45.6 against 45.6 for Tyrone Taylor — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Andrés Chaparro and Tyrone Taylor level at 45.6. Andrés Chaparro leads on Honours, Dominance. Tyrone Taylor leads on Statistics, Longevity, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Chaparro wins: Dominance, Honours
Taylor wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-andres-chaparro-vs-ros-tyrone-taylor
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Chaparro leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Chaparro | 0 | 0 | 26 | 38 | 87 | 87 |
| 🏳️ Taylor | 0 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 214 | 478 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChaparroActive · Washington Nationals | TaylorActive · Chicago Cubs |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 148 | 669 |
| MLB hits | 87 | 478 |
| MLB home runs | 16 | 72 |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 3 | 1 |
| MLB award: EAS Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: VWL Rookie of the Year | 1 | — |
| MLB award: Baseball America Triple-A All-Star | 1 | — |
| Number | 87 | 55 |
| Dominance w25% | 49.4 | 40.4 |
| Peak w20% | 42.7 | 54.8 |
| Longevity w20% | 34.6 | 50.6 |
| Honours w20% | 56 | 26 |
| Statistics w15% | 44.2 | 61.4 |
Andrés Chaparro leads with a GOAT score of 45.6 against 45.6 for Tyrone Taylor — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Taylor scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Chaparro leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chaparro: 45.6, Taylor: 45.6.
Make your case for Chaparro vs Taylor. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.