Who is better, Abbott or Pache?
Cristian Pache leads with a GOAT score of 52.8 against 52.7 for Andrew Abbott — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Pache wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Abbott wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-andrew-abbott-vs-ros-cristian-pache
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Pache leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Abbott | 0 | 0 | 120 | 234 | 514 | 514 |
| 🏳️ Pache | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 68 | 135 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AbbottActive · Cincinnati Reds | PacheActive · New York Mets |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 107 | 265 |
| MLB wins | 34 | — |
| MLB strikeouts | 514 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 2 | 3 |
| MLB award: NL All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: Reds Ernie Lombardi MVP Award | 1 | — |
| Number | 41 | 71 |
| MLB hits | — | 135 |
| MLB home runs | — | 8 |
| MLB award: SAL Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: FSL Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: SOU Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: SOU Post-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Rawlings MiLB Gold Glove | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 54.2 | 56.5 |
| Peak w20% | 64.5 | 45.1 |
| Longevity w20% | 37.8 | 44.2 |
| Honours w20% | 44 | 68 |
| Statistics w15% | 65.7 | 47.8 |
Cristian Pache leads with a GOAT score of 52.8 against 52.7 for Andrew Abbott — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Abbott scores higher on peak, statistics. Pache leads on dominance, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Abbott: 52.7, Pache: 52.8.
Make your case for Abbott vs Pache. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.