Who is better, Abbott or McClanahan?
Andrew Abbott leads with a GOAT score of 52.7 against 52.7 for Shane McClanahan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Abbott wins: Dominance, Honours
McClanahan wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-andrew-abbott-vs-ros-shane-mcclanahan
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Abbott leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Abbott | 0 | 0 | 120 | 234 | 514 | 514 |
| 🏳️ McClanahan | 0 | 0 | 141 | 335 | 456 | 562 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 4 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AbbottActive · Cincinnati Reds | McClanahanActive · Tampa Bay Rays |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 107 | 99 |
| MLB wins | 34 | 43 |
| MLB strikeouts | 514 | 562 |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 2 | — |
| MLB award: NL All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: Reds Ernie Lombardi MVP Award | 1 | — |
| Number | 41 | 18 |
| MLB award: MID Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: AL All-Star | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 54.2 | 54 |
| Peak w20% | 64.5 | 70.1 |
| Longevity w20% | 37.8 | 37.8 |
| Honours w20% | 44 | 38 |
| Statistics w15% | 65.7 | 66.6 |
Andrew Abbott leads with a GOAT score of 52.7 against 52.7 for Shane McClanahan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McClanahan scores higher on peak, statistics. Abbott leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Abbott: 52.7, McClanahan: 52.7.
Make your case for Abbott vs McClanahan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.