Who is better, Wiggins or Randle?
Andrew Wiggins leads with a GOAT score of 60.2 against 59.4 for Julius Randle — a gap of 0.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Andrew Wiggins above Julius Randle: 60.2 vs 59.4. Andrew Wiggins leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Wiggins wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Randle wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-andrew-wiggins-vs-ros-julius-randle
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Wiggins leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Wiggins | 0 | 0 | 1,386 | 3,063 | 7,770 | 13,331 |
| 🏳️ Randle | 0 | 0 | 2 | 917 | 4,776 | 11,115 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WigginsActive · Miami Heat | RandleActive · Brooklyn Nets |
|---|---|---|
| NBA games | 948 | 789 |
| NBA points | 17,475 | 15,176 |
| NBA award: Rookie of the Year | 1 | — |
| NBA award: All-Rookie 1st Team | 1 | — |
| NBA award: NBA Rookie of the Year Award | 1 | — |
| NBA Rookie of the Year Award | 1 | — |
| Number | 22 | 30 |
| NBA award: All-NBA 3rd Team | — | 1 |
| NBA award: Most Improved Player | — | 1 |
| NBA award: All-NBA 2nd Team | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 55.9 | 54.8 |
| Peak w20% | 73.8 | 71.5 |
| Longevity w20% | 63.4 | 63.4 |
| Honours w20% | 38 | 38 |
| Statistics w15% | 74.7 | 73.9 |
Andrew Wiggins leads with a GOAT score of 60.2 against 59.4 for Julius Randle — a gap of 0.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Randle does not lead any of the five categories; Wiggins is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Wiggins: 60.2, Randle: 59.4.
Make your case for Wiggins vs Randle. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.