GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Cirelli vs Coleman

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CirelliWinner
52.9

Cirelli wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Coleman
52.9

Coleman wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Ice Hockey

Shareable URL · /compare/ros-anthony-cirelli-vs-ros-blake-coleman

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏳️ Anthony Cirelli
52.9

Cirelli leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.

1. Anthony Cirelli
52.9
2. Blake Coleman
52.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Form index per season
1. 🏳️ Anthony Cirelli5 seasons played · career day 1,825159 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ Blake Coleman5 seasons played · career day 1,826126 points
-20.8% vs Cirelli at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏳️ Cirelli001150159344
🏳️ Coleman0022795290

Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.

MetricCirelliActive · Tampa Bay LightningColemanActive · Minnesota Wild
NHL games582693
NHL goals147170
NHL assists197155
NHL points344325
NHL award: Stanley Cup22
Number7120
Dominance w25%49.448.5
Peak w20%66.764.9
Longevity w20%53.857
Honours w20%3232
Statistics w15%67.266.5

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Cirelli52.9
Coleman52.9
The people
Cirelli
Coleman

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

FAQ

Who is better, Cirelli or Coleman?

Anthony Cirelli leads with a GOAT score of 52.9 against 52.9 for Blake Coleman — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.

Where does Coleman beat Cirelli?

Coleman scores higher on longevity. Cirelli leads on peak, dominance, statistics.

How is the Cirelli vs Coleman score calculated?

Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cirelli: 52.9, Coleman: 52.9.

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Cirelli vs Coleman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →