Who is better, Gose or Kim?
Anthony Gose leads with a GOAT score of 48.0 against 48.0 for Ha-seong Kim — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Gose wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Kim wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-anthony-gose-vs-ros-ha-seong-kim
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gose leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Gose | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 🏳️ Kim | 0 | 0 | 54 | 184 | 498 | 512 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GoseActive · Kansas City Royals | KimActive · Atlanta Braves |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 416 | 637 |
| MLB wins | 4 | — |
| MLB strikeouts | 48 | — |
| MLB award: SAL Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: SAL Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: FSL Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: EAS Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 2 | — |
| Number | 34 | — |
| MLB hits | — | 512 |
| MLB home runs | — | 57 |
| MLB award: Padres MVP | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Rawlings NL Gold Glove | — | 1 |
| KBO League Golden Glove Award | — | 1 |
| Rawlings Gold Glove Award | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 47.9 | 45.9 |
| Peak w20% | 39.8 | 59.7 |
| Longevity w20% | 53.8 | 44.2 |
| Honours w20% | 56 | 32 |
| Statistics w15% | 40.7 | 62.2 |
Anthony Gose leads with a GOAT score of 48.0 against 48.0 for Ha-seong Kim — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kim scores higher on peak, statistics. Gose leads on dominance, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gose: 48.0, Kim: 48.0.
Make your case for Gose vs Kim. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.