Who is better, Kumar or Hammond?
Wally Hammond leads with a GOAT score of 93.0 against 17.5 for Ashwani Kumar — a gap of 75.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Hammond wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Kumar wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-ashwani-kumar-vs-wally-hammond
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hammond leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Kumar — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Kumar | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
| 🇬🇧 Hammond | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KumarActive · Mumbai Indians | HammondRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Matches (T20 leagues + internationals) | 7 | — |
| Runs | 0 | — |
| Wickets | 11 | — |
| Player of the match | 1 | — |
| Number | 42 | — |
| Test runs | — | 7,249 |
| Test batting average | — | 58.45 |
| First-class centuries | — | 167 |
| Test centuries | — | 22 |
| Test wickets | — | 83 |
| Dominance w25% | 17.5 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 22.2 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 15.5 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 13.5 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 19 | 96 |
Wally Hammond leads with a GOAT score of 93.0 against 17.5 for Ashwani Kumar — a gap of 75.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kumar does not lead any of the five categories; Hammond is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kumar: 17.5, Hammond: 93.0.
Make your case for Kumar vs Hammond. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.