Who is better, Hedges or Bader?
Austin Hedges leads with a GOAT score of 59.9 against 59.9 for Harrison Bader — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Hedges wins: Longevity, Honours
Bader wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-austin-hedges-vs-ros-harrison-bader
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hedges leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Hedges | 0 | 0 | 23 | 26 | 234 | 421 |
| 🏳️ Bader | 0 | 0 | 20 | 120 | 313 | 950 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HedgesActive · Cleveland Guardians | BaderActive · Philadelphia Phillies |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 903 | 954 |
| MLB hits | 518 | 968 |
| MLB home runs | 83 | 122 |
| MLB award: MID Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MID Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 3 | 2 |
| MLB award: TEX Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| MLB award: PCL Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: World Series Championship | 1 | — |
| Number | 27 | — |
| MLB award: Rawlings NL Gold Glove | — | 1 |
| Rawlings Gold Glove Award | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 58.2 | 58.5 |
| Peak w20% | 48.5 | 73.1 |
| Longevity w20% | 63.4 | 57 |
| Honours w20% | 68 | 44 |
| Statistics w15% | 62.4 | 70 |
Austin Hedges leads with a GOAT score of 59.9 against 59.9 for Harrison Bader — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bader scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Hedges leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hedges: 59.9, Bader: 59.9.
Make your case for Hedges vs Bader. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.