Who is better, Hedges or Yastrzemski?
Mike Yastrzemski leads with a GOAT score of 60.1 against 59.9 for Austin Hedges — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Yastrzemski wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Hedges wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-austin-hedges-vs-ros-mike-yastrzemski
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Yastrzemski leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Hedges | 0 | 0 | 23 | 26 | 234 | 421 |
| 🏳️ Yastrzemski | 0 | 0 | 101 | 158 | 444 | 846 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HedgesActive · Cleveland Guardians | YastrzemskiActive · Atlanta Braves |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 903 | 977 |
| MLB hits | 518 | 846 |
| MLB home runs | 83 | 152 |
| MLB award: MID Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MID Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 3 | 2 |
| MLB award: TEX Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: PCL Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: World Series Championship | 1 | — |
| Number | 27 | 18 |
| MLB award: NYP Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: SAL Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: EAS Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 58.2 | 61 |
| Peak w20% | 48.5 | 72 |
| Longevity w20% | 63.4 | 50.6 |
| Honours w20% | 68 | 50 |
| Statistics w15% | 62.4 | 68.7 |
Mike Yastrzemski leads with a GOAT score of 60.1 against 59.9 for Austin Hedges — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hedges scores higher on honours, longevity. Yastrzemski leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hedges: 59.9, Yastrzemski: 60.1.
Make your case for Hedges vs Yastrzemski. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.